Bilski: Business Methods Here to Stay (for Now)
- Bilski et al. v. Kappos, slip op., No. 08-964, 561 U.S. ____ (Jun. 28, 2010)
In Bilski v. Kappos, the Supreme Court affirmed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision, holding that claims describing “a series of steps instructing how to hedge risk” and their associated mathematical formula are not eligible for patent protection under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (link to opinion). But in an opinion reminiscent of KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398 (2007), the Court found the Federal Circuit’s doctrine to be too rigid and not in line with Congressional direction under the Constitution or the Court’s precedent. The Court demoted the Federal Circuit's "machine-or-transformation" test from the sole test for business method patent eligibility to a “useful and important clue, an investigative tool, for determining whether some claimed inventions are processes under § 101,” and more importantly, found that a “categorical exclusion of business method patents” does not exist. In short, the Court echoed its policy that patents that belong in the public domain will not be tolerated, while true innovation should be rewarded with patent protection.
Continue Reading...
Today, too many creators take a passive attitude toward their copyrights. So say the authors of Columbia University Law School's .gif){kind=small}
.gif){kind=small}
