Maryland IP Litigation 2008: Lawsuit Summaries
Below are summaries of recent IP-related lawsuits filed in the the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in 2008 (source: Justia).
- Magnus v. Association of Pet Dog Trainers, No. 8:2008cv00850; filed April 4, 2008; assigned to J. Williams
Plaintiff Vicki Lynn Magnus, a Waldorf, MD, resident, filed this declaratory judgment action against the Association of Pet Dog Trainers (APDT), a New Jersey company based in Greenville, SC. APDT allegedly owns the registered mark for its acronym name. According to her complaint, Magnus, a former member of APDT, created an Internet message board on December 1, 2003, "for discussion of issues of common interest" among other APDT members. Claiming the board was protected under the doctrine of fair use (copyright), the Lanham Act (trademark), and free speech under the First Amendment, Magnus received a cease and desist letter from APDT in 2006. When she objected, her membership was allegedly terminated "without cause." About the same time, APDT sent a "take down" letter to the Internet Service Provider and host of the message board, which complied with the request. Magnus is seeking relief in the form of a declaration that her use of the APDT acronym is lawful, noninfringing, and qualifies as a fair use.
- Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. Theodosakis, No. 1:2008cv00879, filed April 7, 2008; assigned to J. Blake
Nutramax is a Maryland company based in Edgewood, MD. Defendants are Jason Theodosakis, M.D., and Supplement Testing Institute, Inc. (STI), which allegedly sell nutritional supplements, including those allegedly covered by U.S. Patent No. 6,797,289, for “Use of anabolic agents, anti-catabolic agents, antioxidant agents, and analgesics for protection, treatment and repair of connective tissues in humans and animals.” Claim 1 of the ‘289 patent covers a “synergistic combination of an aminosugar and avocado/soybean unsponifiables [ASU].” Nutramax sells Cosamin® ASU and Avoca ASU® under the '289 patent. This is the second lawsuit filed this year by Nutramax in which it asserts the '289 patent (see here).
-
National Fallen Firefighters Foundation v. TWL Corp., No. 1:2008cv00896, April 9, 2008; assigned to J. Davis
This trademark infringement lawsuit involves the mark EVERYONE GOES HOME owned by NFFF, and defendants use of EVERYBODY GOES HOME in connection with a training simulation program.
-
Bill Me Later, Inc. v. MODASolutions Corp., No. 1:2008cv00897, filed April 9, 2008; assigned to J. Blake
This trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition lawsuit involves the mark BILL ME LATER, allegedly owned by plaintiff, who is seeking monetary damages, and attorney's fee, among other relief, from Canada-based MODASolutions.
This trademark infringement lawsuit involves the mark EVERYONE GOES HOME owned by NFFF, and defendants use of EVERYBODY GOES HOME in connection with a training simulation program.
This trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition lawsuit involves the mark BILL ME LATER, allegedly owned by plaintiff, who is seeking monetary damages, and attorney's fee, among other relief, from Canada-based MODASolutions.