Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog : Maryland Intellectual Property Lawyer & Attorney : Brian Wm. Higgins : Serving Baltimore, Columbia, Frederick

     The Maryland Bar Association annual meeting in Ocean City, MD, June 9-12, 2010, includes seminars focusing on IP and related issues, including those covering social networking law:  "Handshakes to Tweeting" (June 10), "Social Media and the Law - A Look at Legal Issues in Social Networking" (June 10) .   

     The 2010 University of Maryland University College Center for Intellectual Property  (CIP) Symposium will be held June 22-24, 2010, in Washington, DC.  The focus of the symposium is "Sustaining Culture in Copyright."  Keynote speakers include Peter Jaszi, Professor of Law, American University Washington College of Law, who will speak about fair use, and William Patry, Senior Copyright Counsel at Google, Inc. (and publisher of his own personal blogs, including The Patry Copyright Blog), who will speak about his recent book entitled "Moral Panics & Copyright Wars."

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

• Copyright Office Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Amend Current Regulations Governing Group Registrations

In its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Copyright Office is proposing to amend 37 CFR Part 202, the current regulations governing group registrations, to allow the grouping of individual works on one registration application. Under the proposal, applicants who take advantage of the group registration option would be required to file their claims electronically. Comments are due on or before May 30, 2008. The stated purpose of the amended regulations is to increase online registrations (link to Copyright Office).

• RIAA Lawsuit Victory Against Individual Getting a Second Look

William Patry at The Patry Copyright Blog posted an interesting article recently concerning one of the most watched music industry lawsuits (see "Breaking Development in Thomas Making Available Case"). As Patry notes, the case of Capitol v. Thomas in Minnesota "has been watched worldwide," due primarily to the large amount of the jury verdict awarded against Ms. Thomas (who, by the way, has moved for a new trial on the basis that the amount awarded was unconstitutionally excessive). As discussed by Patry and reported by the Recording Industry v. The People Blog, attention given the jury award has now shifted after the District Court "adjourned the briefing schedules for the determination of whether it had committed a 'manifest error of law' when it accepted the RIAA's proposed jury instruction that merely 'making available' [a music file] constituted an infringement of the distribution right and overlooked the controlling Eighth Circuit case, National Car Rental System v. Computer Associates, which had held that there can be no infringement of the 17 USC 106(3) 'distribution right' without actual dissemination of copies or phonorecords."

For other RIAA posts on this website, see "Recording Industry Follows Through on Threats to Sue" and "Downloading Music Benefits Both Consumers and Artists, Study Finds".

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (1)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link